Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 08/2003

« Some Couple Are More Equal Than Others When Death Does Them Part (Not That There's Anything Wrong With That) | Main | An Arcane Point, Well Expressed »

September 22, 2004

Comments

UCL

This opinion jives with a case I'm handing right now, where the insured under a homeowners' policy exited his vehicle in a parking lot after a small fender bender, and allegedly assaulted the plaintiff. The insurer reserved rights on both intentional act and use-of-auto exclusions, but would likely prevail only on the former and not the latter. (The insurer will probably settle without reaching the coverage issue, however, because it's not worth defending.)

The comments to this entry are closed.